Comportamiento Organizacional

pp. 14*19. * ^ é a s e H. W. Lane y D. G. Simpson. “Bribery In International B usiness: Whose Problem Is It?" en H. W. Lane y J . J . DlStefano (eds.), International Management lichatHor; From Policij to Practice (Scarborough. Ontario; Nelson C anada, 1988), pp. 236-47. *^Lane an d DlStefano, Intenxational Management Behavior, pp. 4-5. Child. C ulture, Contingency a n d Capitalism In the C ross-National S tudy of O rga­ nizations". en L. L. Cumm ings y B. M. S taw (eds.). R(?s(?arc/i in Organixationnl Behavior, Vol. 3 (Greenwich. CT: JAI Press. 1981), pp. 303-56. *’’G. Hofstede, Cu/fure’s Consequences; Intenm tlonal D ifferences in Work Related Values (Beverly Hills. CA; Sage Publications. 1980). *®Esto se b a sa en M. I lornblower y R.T. Zlntl, “Racism", Tiine, 12 de agosto de 1991, pp. 36-38. '®Este recu ad ro se basa en K. Freed. "C anadians New Pride in Own Identity". Los Angeles Tüi\es, 22 de enero de 1986, p. 1; M. McDonald, "Pride a n d Patriotism", M aciean's. 7 de Julio de 1986, pp. 10-13; N. J . Adler y J . L. G raham , "B usiness Negotiations; C an ad ian s Are Not J u s t Like Americans“. Canadian Journal oJAdm inistrative Sciences, septiem bre de 1987, pp. 211-38; A. Phillips. "Defining Identity". Maclean’s, 4 de enero de 1988, pp. 44-45; D. Baer, E. G rabb y W. A. Jo h n sto n . “The Values of C anadians and Americans: A Critical Analysis and R eassessm ent", Social Forces, marzo de 1990, pp. 693-713; y F. Livesy, "Employee Compen­ satio n and Benefits; C anada vs. U.S.", B u sin ess Qiiarterlij, prim avera de 1990, pp. 20-26. ^®F. K luckhohn y F. L. Strodtbeck. Variations it\ Valtie Orientations (Evanston. IL: Row, Peterson. 1961). ®*Boyacigiller y Adler, “The Parochial D inosaur", p. 274. ^^Hofstede, Cufiiirc’s Consequences; y G. IJqfstecle, “The Cultural Relativity oJOrganizM- tional Practices and Theories'', Journal o f Intemattonal B u sin ess Studies, otoño de 1983, pp. 75-89. ^ ^ é a s e J. R. Lincoln, "Employee Work A ttitudes and Managem ent Practice in th e U.S. a n d Ja p a n : Evidence From a Large Comparative Survey", California Management Review, otoño de 1989, pp. 89*106; B. D. Cooney, "Jap an an d America: C u ltu re C ounts". Training and Dei>e/opmen( Journal, agosto de 1989. pp. 58-61; y J . R. Lincoln y A. L. Kalloberg, Culture. Control a n d Commitment: A S tu d y oJ Work Organization a n d Work A ttitudes in the United S faics an d Japan, (Nueva York: Cambridge University Press, 1990). ^^Esta sección se b a sa en la obra de J . T. G ullahorn y J. E. G ullahorn, "An Extensión of th e U-Curve Hypothesis", Journal oJSocial Sciences, enero de 1963, pp. 34-47. ^®N. J . Adler. "Cross C ultural Management Research; The O strich a n d the Trend", A cadem y q f Management Rerlew , abril de 1983, pp. 226-32.