Comportamiento Organizacional

‘’^ é a s e , por ejemplo, J. Thom as y R. W. GriíTln, “The Social Information Processing Model of Task Design: A Review of th e L iterature”, A cadem y q f Managem ent Journal, octubre de 1983, pp. 672-82. ‘^^Este argum ento se desarrolla e n G. S trau ss, “The Personality-versus-O rganlzatlon Theory", en L. R. Sayles(ed.), índíuírftjaíísm andB ^B iiS íness(N ueva York: McGraw-Hill, 1963). pp. 67-79; y J . R. Hackman, “The Design of Work In th e 1980’s ”, Organizational Dynamics, verano de 1978, pp. 3-17. ‘*^E. A. Locke. T ow ard a Theory of T ask Motivation a n d Incentives", Organizational Behavior and Human Peifonnance, mayo de 1968, pp. 157-89. ^®P. C. Earley, P. Wojnaroskl y W. Prest, “T ask P lanning a n d Energy Expended; Exploration of How Goals Influence Performance", Jo um ai o f Applied Psychology, febrero de Í987. pp. 107-14, '’^G. P. Latham y G. A. Yukl, "A Review of R esearch on th e Application of Goal Setting in Organizations". A cadem y q f Management Journal, diciembre de 1975. pp. 824-45; E. A. Locke. K.N. Shaw, L. M, S aari y G. P. Latham , "Goal S etting an d T ask Perform ance”, Psychological Bulletin, enero de 1981, pp. 125-52; A. J . Mento. R. P. Steel y R. J . K arren, "A Mfta-Analytlc S tudy of th e EfTects of Goal Setting o n T ask Performance: 1966-1984", Organi­ zational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, febrero de 1987, pp. 52-83; M. E. Tubbs. "Goal Setting: A Meta-Analytic Exam ination of th e Empirical Evidence", Journal o f Applied Psychology, agosto de 1986. pp. 474-83; P. C. Earley. G. B. N orthcraft. C. L eeyT . R. Lituchy, "Impact of I*rocess an d O utcom e Feedback on th e R elation of Goal S etting to T ask Performance", A cadem y o f Managem ent Journal, m arzo de 1990. pp. 87-105; y E. A. Locke y G. P. Liitham . A Theory o f Goal Setting and T a sk Perfonnance, (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 1990). ^®J. M. Ivancevlch y J . T. McMahon. ‘T h e EfTects of Goal Setting. External Feedback, an d Self-Generated Feedback on O utcom e Variables: A Field Experim ent". A cadem y o f Management Journal, Junlo de 1982. pp. 359-72. ^V éase, por ejemplo. G. P. Latham , M. Erez, E. A. Locke. “Resolving Scientific D isputes by the Jo in t Design of Crucial E xperim ents by th e A ntagonists: Application to the E rez-L athan D ispute Regarding Participation In Goal Setting", Joiiniai o f Applied Psychology, noviembre de 1988. pp. 753-72. 52 M. Erez. P. C. Earley y C. L. Hulin. “The Im pact of Participation on Goal Acceptance and Performance: A Two-Step Model", A cadem y o f Managem ent Journal, m arzo de 1985, pp. 50-66. ®^J. R. Hollenbeck, C. R. Williams y H. J . Klein. “An Empirical Exam ination of th e A ntecedents of Comm itment to Difllcult Goals", Journal o fApplied Psychology, febrero de 1989, pp. 18-23. ®‘*A. B andura, "Self-Efllcacy; Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change", Psycho­ logical Review, mayo de 1977. pp. 191-215; y M. E. Gist, "Self-EiBcacy: Im plications for O rganizational Behavior and H um an Resource Management", A cadem y o f Managem ent Re­ view, ]uho de 1987. pp. 472-85. ^®E. A. Locke. E. Frederick. C. Lee y P. Bobko. "Effect of Self-Efficacy. Goals, a n d Task Strategies on Task Performance", Jounm l o f Applied Psychology, mayo de 1984, pp. 241-51. ®®A. B andu ra y D. Cervone, “Differential Engagem ent in Self-Reactive Influences in Cognitively-Based Motivation", Organizational BehaiHorand Human Decision Processes, agosto d c 1986. pp. 92-113. ®^Véase, J . C. Anderson y C. A. O'Reilly, “Effects of a n O rganizational Control System on Managerial Satisfaction and Performance", Human Relations. Junio de 1981, pp. 491-501; y J . P. Meyer, B. Schacht-Cole e I. R. Gellatly. “An E xam ination of th e Cognitive M echanism s by Which Assigned Goals Affect Task Performance a n d R eactions to Performance", Journal o f Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 18, Num. 5, 1988, pp. 390-408. ®^R. M. S teers y L. W. Porter, Moff(»aifon anrf Work Behavior, 2a. ed. (Nueva York: McGraw-Hill, 1979), p. 13. ®®E. A. Locke, "I^ th am vs. Komakl: A Tale of Two Paradigms", Jounm l o f Applied Psychology, febrero de 1980. pp. 16-23. ®*^J. S. Adams. "Inequity in Social E xchanges“, en L. Berkowltz (ed.). A d van ces In Experimental Social Psychology, (Nueva York: Academic Press, 1965). pp. 267-300. ®'P. S. Goodman, "An Exam ination of R eferents Used In th e E valuation of Pay", Organizational Behavior an d Human P e^onnance, o ctub re de 1974, pp. 170-95; S. Ronen, “Equity Perception in Multiple Comparisons: A Field Study", Human Relations, abrll de 1986, pp. 333-46; R. W. Scholl, E. A. Cooper y J . F. McKenna, “Referent Selection In D eterm ining Equity Perception: Differential EfTects on Behavioral a n d A ttltudlnal Outcomes", Personnel Psychology, prim avera de 1987, pp. 113-27; y T. P. Summ ers y A. S. DeNisi, "In S earch of