Comportamiento Organizacional

Adam s’ O ther: Reexam ination of Referents Used In the Evaluation of Pay", Human Relations. Junlo de 1990, pp. 497-511. ®*Ooodman, "An Exam ination of Referents”: y G. R. O ldham , C. T. Kullk, L. P. S teplna y M. L. Ambrose, "Relations Between S ituational Factors a n d the Comparative Referents Used by Employees", A cadem y q f Management Journal, septiem bre de 1986, pp. 599-608. ^ ^ 'é a se , por ejemplo, E. Walster, G. W. W alster y W. G. Scott. Equity: Theory and Research. (Boston; Allyn & Bacon, 1978); y J . Greenberg. "Cognitive Reevaluatlon of Outcom es In R esponse to U nderpaym ent Inequity", A cadem y o f Management Journal, m arzo de 1989, pp. 174-84. ®^P. S. Goodman y A. Ftledm an, “An Exam ination of Adams’ Theory of Inequity". Adm lnlstrattoe Science Quarterty, septiem bre de 1971, pp. 271-88; R. P. Vecchlo. "An indlvl- dual-DUTerences In terpretation of th e Conflicting Predictions G enerated by Equity Theory and Expectancy Theory", Journal q fApplied Psychology, agosto de 1981, pp. 470-81; J . Greenberg, “Approaching Equity and Avoiding Inequity In G roups a n d O rganizations", e n J . G reenberg y R. L. Cohen (eds.). Equity an d Justice In Social Behavior (Nueva York: Academic Press, 1982). pp. 389-435; R. T. Mowday, “E quity Theory Predictions of Behavior In O rganlzatlones”. en R. M. S teers y L. W. Porter (eds.), Mottiyatlon and WorkBehai^lor, 4a. ed. (Nueva York: McGraw-HUl, 1987). pp. 89-110; y E. W, Miles. J . D. Hatfield y R. C. H usem an, "The Equity Sensitive C onstruct: Potential Implications for Worker Performance", Journal oJManagement, diciembre de 1989, pp. 581-88. ®®J.GreenbergyS. Om steln, "High S ta tu s Jo b Title a s C om pensation for Underpayment: A Test of Equity Theory", Journal q f Applied Psychology, mayo de 1983, pp. 285-97; y J. G reenberg. "Equity and Workplace S tatu s: A Field Exi>crlment", Journal q fApplied Psychology. noviembre de 1988, pp. 606-13. ®®P. S. Goodman. “Social Comparison Process In O rganizations", en B. M. S taw y G. R. S alancik (eds.), Wcu> Direcitons in Organizational Dehai^lor (Chicago: St, Clair, 1977). pp. 97-132. ®^V. H. Vroom. W o rkand Motivation (Nueva York: Jo h n WUey. 1964). ®®Véase. por ejemplo, H. G. H enem an 111 y D. P. Schwab, "Evaluation of R esearch on Expectancy Theory Prediction of Employee Performance". Psychological BuUetlix. Jullo de 1972, pp. 1-9; T. R. Mitchell. "Elxpectancy Models of Jo b Satisfaction, O ccupational Preference and Effort: A Theoretical, Methodological an d Empirical Appraisal", Psychological Bulletü}, noviem­ b re de 1974, pp. 1053-77; y L. R elnharth y M. A. Wahba. "Expectancy Theory a s a Predictor of Work Motivation, Effort Exp>endlture, and Job Performance", A cadem y q f Management Journal, septiem bre de 1975, pp. 502-37. ®Véase. por ejemplo. L. W. Porter y E. E. Lawler III, Managerial A ttlliuies a n d Perfor­ m ance (Homewood. IL: Richard D. Irwin, 1968); D. F. Parker y L. Dyer, "Expectancy Theory a s a W lthln-Person Behavioral Choice Model: An Empirical Test of Some C onceptual a n d Methodological Refinements", O rganizai/ona/ Behavior and Human Performance, o ctub re de 1976, pp. 97-117; y H. J . Arnold, "A Test of the Multiplicative Hyj)othesls of Expectancy-Va- lence Theories of Work Motivation", A cadcm y q f Management Journal, abrll de 1981, pp. 128-41. ^ ^ ro o m se refiere a e sta s tres variables como t>o/encía, Instmm entalitlad y expectativa, respectivam ente. ^ 'e . A. Locke. "Personnel A ttitudes and Motivation”, en M. R. Rosenzweigy L. W. F*orter (eds). Annual R eview q f Psychology, (Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, 1975), p. 459. ^^P. M. Muchlnsky, "A C omparison of W ithin - and Across- Subjects Analyses of the Expectancy-Valence Model for Predicting Effort", A cadem y oJManagem ent Joum dl. marzo de 1977. pp. 154-58. ^^R. J . House, H. J. Shapiro y M. A. Wahba, "Expectancy Theory a s a Predictor of Work Behavior an d A ttitudes: A Re-evaluatlon of Empirical Evidence", Decision Sciences, enero de 1974. pp. 481-506. A. Kovach. "What Motivates Employees? W orkers an d S upervisors Give Different Answers". B u sin ess Horizons, septiem bre-octubre de 1987, pp. 58*65. ^®L. H. Peters. E .J. O’Connor y C. J. Rudolf. "The Behavioral and Affective Consequences of Performance-Relevant S ituational Variables". Organizational Behavior a n d Human Perfor­ mance. febrero de 1980, pp. 79-96; M. B lum bergy C. D. Pringle. “The Missing O pportunity In O rganizational Research: Some Implications for a Theory of Work Performance". A cadem y oJ Management Review, o ctub re de 1982, pp. 560-69; y D. A. W aldm any W. D. Spangler. "Putting Together th e Pieces: A Closer Look at th e D eterm inants of Jo b Performance", Human Perfor­ mance, Vol. 2. 1989, pp. 29-59. J. Adler. Intemaifonaf Di/riensions o f Organtzaifona/ Behavior. 2a. ed.. (Boston: PWS*Kent Publishing. 1991), p. 152.