Comportamiento Organizacional

LECTURAS COMPLEMENTARIAS NOTAS AsHFORTH. B .E . Y F . M a e l. “S o cia l Id e n tity T h e o ry £ind th e O rg a n iz a tio n " . Academ y o f Management Revlew . e n e ro d e 1 9 8 9 . p p . 2 0 -3 9 . L a s p e r s o n a s tie n d e n a c la s ific a rs e y a c la s ific a r a o tr o s e n d ife re n te s c a te g o ría s s o c ia le s . E s te a rtíc u lo r e p a s a la s im p lic a c io n e s q u e e s to s r e s u lta d o s tie n e n e n la so c ia liz a c ió n d e la s o rg a n iz a c io n e s , e l c o n flic to d e ro le s y la s re la c io n e s e n tr e g ru p o s . C h a n c e . P .. “G re a t E x p e rim e n ts in T e am C h em istry " . A c ro ss the Board", m a y o d e 1 9 8 9 . p p . 1 8 -2 5 . [D escribe lo s é x ito s e n la c re a c ió n d e o rg a n iz a c io n e s c o n b a s e e n e q u ip o s y c o n s id e r a q u e e s t a s o rg a n iz a c io n e s s o n u n o d e lo s e x p e rim e n to s e m p r e s a ria le s m á s im p o rta n te s d e n u e s tr o s d ía s . H ackm an . J .R . (ed.). Groups That Work (and Those That Don’t) fS a n F ra n c is c o : J o s s e y - B a s s . 1 9 90 ). D e sc rib e la s c o n d ic io n e s n e c e s a r ia s p a r a q u e e l tr a b a jo d e e q u ip o s e a efectivo . L a rs o n . C .E . Y F .M . L a fa s to . T eamw o rh What M ust Go R ig h t/W ha t Can Co Wrong, (N ew b u ry P a rk . CA: S a g e P u b lic a tio n s . 1 9 89 ). G u ía p r á c tic a p a r a lo g ra r q u e lo s e q u ip o s tr a b a je n d e m a n e r a m á s efe c tiv a . SimosTROM. E .. K .P. DE M e u se y D . F u t r e l l . “W o rk T e am s : A p p lic a tio n s a n d E ffe c tiv e n e ss". American P sy c h o lo g ist, fe b re ro d e 1 9 9 0 . p p . 1 2 0 -3 3 . R e p a s a lo s fa c to re s q u e in flu y e n e n la e fic a c ia d e lo s e q u ip o s d e tr a b a jo . WORCHEL, S .. W . W o o d Y J.A . Sim pson (e d s.). Group Process and P ro d u cííu ííy . (N ew b u ry P a rk . CA: S a g e P u b lic a tio n s . 1 9 9 1 ). R e p a s a la s in v e s tig a c io n e s c o rr ie n te s s o b re la p ro d u c tiv id a d y el fu n c io n a m ie n to d e g r u p o s p e q u e ñ o s . 'B asa d o en B. Acohldo. "Boeing Workforce Tries New Direction", Dallas Mom íng News, 5 de mayo de 1991, p.H8. ®L. R. Sayles, "Work G roup Beliavlor an d th e Larger O rganization" e n C. A rensburg et al. (eds.), R esearch ín Jndiisfríaí Reíaítons, (Nueva York: H arper & Row, 1957), pp. 131-45. ^B.W. Tuckm an, "Developmental Sequences In Small G roups". Psychological Bulletin, ju n lo de 1965, pp. 384*99; B. W. T uckm an y M. C. Je n se n , "Stages o f Sm ail-G roup Develop­ m ent Revisited". Group a n d Organizational Studies, diciembre de 1977, pp. 419-27; y M. F. Maples. "Group Development; E xtending T uckm an’s Theory". Journalfo r Specialists in Group Work, otoño de 1988, pp. 17-23. ^C. J . G. Gerslck, “Time a n d T ransition In Work Teams: Toward a New Model of G roup Development", A cadcniJ/q/'M anageínení Joum ai, m arzo de 1988, pp. 9-41; y C . J . G. Gerslck. "Marking Time: Predictable T ransitions In T ask G roups". A cadem y q f Managem ent Journal, ju n io de 1989, pp. 274-309. ®Este modelo se b asa su stan cialm en te en la obra de P, S. Goodman, E. Ra\dln y M. Sclim lnke, “U nderstanding G roups in O rganizations", en L. L. Cumm ings y B. M. S taw (eds.). R esearch in Organizational Behavior. Vol. 9 (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 1987), pp. 124-28; J. R. H ackm an. “The Design of Work Team s“, en J . W. Lorsch (ed.). Handbook o f Organizational B ehautor (Englewood CllfTs. NJ; Prentice Hall, 1987), pp. 315-42; yG . R. B u sh eyA . L. Jo im so n , “C ontextual a n d Internal V ariables Aflectlng T ask G roup O utcom es In O rganizations", Group a n d Organization Studies, diciembre de 1989, pp. 462*82. ®F. Frledlander, “The Ecology of Work G roups", en J . W. Lorsch (ed.). Handbook o f Organizational Behavior, pp. 301-14; y E . Sund strom e 1. A ltman, "Physical E nvironm ents a n d Work G roup Effectiveness“, en L. L. Cumm ings y B. M. S taw (eds.). Research In Organizational Behavior, Vol 11, (Greenwich. CT: JAI Press. 1989), pp. 175-209. V é a se , por ejemplo. J . Krantz, “G roup P rocesses Under Conditions of O rganizational Decline", The Jo um ai ofAppZ/ed Behanforai Science. Vol. 21, No. 1, 1985, pp. 1-17. ®Hackman, “The Design of Work Teams", pp. 325-26. ^Véase, por ejemplo, G. R. O ldham y Y Fried, “Employee Reactions to W orkspace C haracteristics", Journal o f Applied Psychology, febrero de 1987, pp. 75*80. *®A. D. SzUagy, J r. y M. J . Wallace, Jr., Organizational B e h au to ran d Peiformance, 4a. ed. (Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresm an, 1987), p. 223. "ifaid. E. Shaw . Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology, (Morristown, NJ: Gener Learning Press, 1976). pp. 350-51.