Comportamiento Organizacional

39 P ara p a rte de la controversia e n torno a la definición de cohesión, véase J . Keyton y J . Sprlngston, "Redefining Cohesiveness In G roups", Small Group Research, mayo d e 1990. pp. 234-54. ^®Véase, por ejemplo. 1. Summ ers, T. Coffelt y R. E. Horton. “Work-Group Cohesion", Psychological Reports, o ctub re de 1988, pp. 627-36. “**0. Insko y M. Wilson. “Interpersonal A ttraction a s a F unction of Social Interaction", Journal o f Personality a n d Social Psychology, diciembre de 1977, pp. 903-11. T. G ullahorn, “D istance and Friendship a s F actors in th e G ross Interaction Matrix", Sociometry, febrero-marzo de 1952, pp. 123-34. ^^E. J. T hom as yC . F. Fink, “Effects of G roup Size", Psychoiogfcai BuHeiin, Jullo de 1963. pp. 371-84. ‘*^Bettenhausen, “Five Years of G roups Research: What We Have Learned a n d W hat Needs to Be Addressed", p. 362. R. Taylor y D. S. S trassberg. "The Effects of Sex Composition on C ohesiveness and Interpersonal Learning In Short-Term Personal G rowth G roups", Psuchotherapu, verano de 1986, pp. 267-73. ^®C. A. W rlsberg y M. V. D raper, “Sex. Sex Role O rientation, an d th e C ohesion of Intercollegiate Basketball Team s“, Journal o f Sports Behavior, m arzo de 1988, pp. 45-54. Stein, “Conflict and Cohesion: A Review of th e Literature". JoumcU oJ Conflict Resolution, marzo de 1976, pp. 143-72. '‘^A. Zander. “The Psychology of G roup Processes", en M. R. Rosenzwelg y L. W. Porter (eds.), A /iniiai R eview o f Psychology, Vol. 30 (Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, 1979), p. 436. ‘*^Véase, por ejemplo, L. Berkowitz, "Group S tan d ard s, Cohesiveness, a n d Productivity”, //lifiian Relations, noviembre de 1954, pp. 509-19; y C. N. Greene, "Cohesion an d Productivity In Work G roups", Smaff Group Behavior, febrero de 1989, pp. 70-86. ^^Nleva, Fleishm an y Rieck, “Team Dimensions", p. 17. ®’t . p. Verney, “Role Perception Congruence, Performance, a n d S atisfaction“, en D. J . V redenburgh y R. S. S chuler (eds.). Effective Management: Research a n d Application, A ctas de la XX Reunión a n u a l de la E astern Academy of M anagem ent, P ittsburgh, PA, mayo de 1983, pp. 24-27. e o M. Van Sell, A. P. Brief y R. S. Schuler, "Role Conflict a n d Role Ambiguity: Integration o f th e L iterature and D irections for F u tu re R esearch“, Htiman Relations, enero de 1981, pp. 4 3 -7 1: y A. 0 . Bedelan y A. A. A rmenakis, "A Path-Analytic S tu d y of th e C onsequences o f Role Conflict and Ambiguity“, A cadem y q f Management Journal, Junio de 1981. pp. 417-24. ®^Shaw, Gnaup Dynamics. ^^B. Mullen, C. Symons. L. Hu, y E. Salas, “G roup Size. Leadership Behavior, an d Subo rd in ate Satisfaction", Journal oJGeneral Psychology, abrll de 1989, pp. 155-70. ®®Hackman, “The Design of Work Teams", p. 324.