Comportamiento Organizacional

Blank, J . R. Weltzel y S. G. Green. "A Test of th e S ituational Leadership Theory". D anserau, J . C ashm an y G. G raen, “In strum en tality Theory and E quity Theory as Com plem entary Approaches In Predicting th e R elationship of Leadership and Turnover Among M anagers”. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, octub re de 1973, pp. 184-200; y G. G raen, M. Novak y P. Somm erkam p, "The Effects of Leader-Member Exchange a n d Job Design on Productivity an d Satisfaction: Testing a Dual A ttachm ent Model“. Organizational Behavior an d Human Performance, agosto de 1982. pp. 109*31. 37 G.. G raen y J . C ashm an, “A Role.Making Model of Leadership In Form al O rganizations: A Development Approach", en J . G. H unt y L. L. Larson (eds.). Leadership Frontiers. (Kent OH: Kent S tate University F*ress, 1975). pp. 143-65; y R. L id eny G. G raen, "GenerallzabUity of the Vertical Dyad Linkage Model of Leadership", A cadem y o f Management Journal, septiem bre de 1980, pp. 451-65. ^®D. Duchon. S. G. Green y T. D. Taber, "Vertical Dyad Linkage: A Longitudinal A ssessm ent of Antecedents, Measures, a n d Consequences", Journal o f Applied Psychology, febrero de 1986, pp. 56-60. ^®Véase, por ejemplo, G. G raen. M. Novak y P. Somm erkam p, T h e Effects of Leader- Member Exchange": T. S can d u ra y G. G raen, “M oderating Effects of Initial Leader-Member Exchange S ta tu s o n th e Effects of a Leadership Intervention". Journal o f Appiied Psychology, agosto de 1984, pp. 428-36; R. P. Vecchlo y B. C. Gobdel, “The Vertical Dyad Linkage Model of Leadership: Problem s a n d Prospects“, Organizational Behavior a n d Human Performance. agosto de 1984. pp. 5-20; yT . M. D ockeryy D. D. Steiner, “The Role of th e Initial Interaction In Leader-Member Exchange", Group a n d Organization Studies, diciembre de 1990, pp. 395-413. ^®A. Jago, “Leadership: Perspectives In Theory an d Research", M anagem ent Science, m arzo de 1982, pp. 331. ^*R. J . House. “A Piith-Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness". Afímíntetraííi>e Science Quarterty, septiembre de 1971, pp. 321-38; R. J . House y T. R. Mitchell, "Path-CioaJ Theory of Leadership", J6uniaf<)/‘Coniefnpora/yBiisiness. otoño de 1974, p. 86:yR . J . House, “Retrosf>ectlve Comment", en L. E. Boone y D. D. Bowen (eds.). The Great Writings In Management and Organizational Behavior, 2a. ed. (Nueva York: Random House, 1987), pp. 354-64. ^V é a se J. Indlk, "Path-Goal Theory of Leadership: A Meta-Analysis", ponencia p re se n ­ tad a e n la Conferencia d e la National Academy of M anagem ent, Chicago, agosto de 1986; y R. T. Keller. "A Test of the Path-Goal Theory of Leadership w ith Need for C larity a s a m oderator in R esearch an d Development O rganizations", Jo um a i o f Applied Psychology, abrll de 1989, pp. 208-12. H. Vroom y P. W. Yetton. Leadership a n d Dectslon-Makiiig. (Pittsburgh: Univ of P ittsburgh Press, 1973). ^*V.H. Vroom y A. G. Jago, The New Leadershij): Managing P o rtfc ^ f/o n tn Organizations, (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1988). Véase, e n especial, el capítulo 8. ^ ^ é a s e . por ejemplo, R. H. G. Field, “A T est of th e Vroom-Yetton Normative Model of Leadership", Jo um ai o f Applied Psychology, ocfijbre d e ¡982, pp. 523-32; C. R. Leana. "Power R elinquishm ent v ersu s Power Sharing: Theoretical C larification a n d Empirical C om parison of Delegation a n d Participation", Journal o f Applied Psychology, mayo de 1987. pp. 228-33; J . T. E ttllng y A. G. Jago, “Participation Under Conditions of Conflict: More on th e Validity of the Vroom-Yetton Model". Jo um ai q f Management Studies, enero de 1988, pp. 73-83: y R. H. G. Field y R. J . House. "A Test of th e Vroom-Yetton Model Using M anager a n d Subordinate Reports". Jo um a / o f Applied Psychology, ju n lo de 1990, pp. 362-66. ^®Dobblns. Long, D edrlcky Clemons, "The R oleofSelf-M onitoringand G ender on Leader Emergence"; y S. J . Zaccaro, R. J . Fotly D. A. Kenny, “Self-Monitoring and T rait Based Variance in Leadership: An Investigation of Leader Flexibility Across Multiple G roup S ituations". Journal o f Applied Psychology, abrll de 1991. pp. 308-15. ‘ ^S. K erry J. M. Jerm ler, “S u b stitu tes for Leadership: Their Meaning a n d M easurement", O fganizafiona/ Behavior a n d Ihim an Performance, declembre de 1978, pp. 375-403; J . P. Howell y P. W. Ctorfman, “S u b stitu tes for Leadership: Test of a C onstruct", A cad em y o f M anagem ent Journal, dlclem brede 1981. pp. 714-28; P. W. Howard yW . F. Joyce. "S u b stitu tes for Leadership: A Statistical Refinement", ponencia p resen tad a en la 42 Conferencia a n u a l de la Academy of M anagement. Nueva York, agosto de 1982; J . P. Howell, P. W. Dorfm an y S. Kerr. "Leadership a n d S u b stitu tes for Leadership", Jounm l o fApplied Behavioral Science, Vol. 22, Num. 1. 1986. pp. 29-46; J. P. Dorfman, P. W. Dorfman y S. Kerr, "Moderator V ariables In Leadership Research". A cadem y o f Management Review , enero de 1986, pp. 88-102; N. J. Pltner. "Leadership S u b stitu tes: Their Factorial Validity in EducationaJ O rganizations", E du­ cational APsychologlcal Measurement. verano de 1988, pp. 307-15; y J . P. Howell. D. E. Bowen, P. W. Dorfman, S. Kerr y P. M. Podsakoff, "S u b stitu tes for Leadership: Effective A lternatives to Ineffective Leadership", Orga/iizaffonai Dynamics, verano d e 1990, pp. 21-38. ^®B. Karmel, "Leadership: A Challenge to Traditional R esearch Methods an d A ssum p­ tions". A cadem y o f Management Review, Jullo d e 1978, pp. 477-79. ^^Schein. Organizational Psychology, p. 132. ®*Véase L. R. Anderson, "Toward a Two-Track Model of Leadership Training: Suggestions from Self-Monitoring Theory", S/na/< Group Research, mayo d e 1990, pp. 147-67.