Comportamiento Organizacional

Woodward, ¡ndiistriol Organization: Theory and Practice. (Londres; Oxford University Press, 1965). Perrow. "A Fram ework for the Comparative Analysis of Organlziitlons", American Sociological ReiHew, abrll de 1967, pp. 194-208. D. Thompson. Organizations (n Action. (NuevaYork; McGraw-HUI. 1967). p. 17. '^ J. H agey M. Aiken, “Routine Technology, Social S tru ctu re, an d O rganizational Goals", Adminlstrathye Science Quarterly, septiem bre de 1969, pp. 366-77. ^^C. C. Miller, W. H. Gllck, Y. W angyG . P. Huber, “U nderstandingT echnology-S tructure Relationships: Theory Development and Meta-Analytic Theory Testing“, A cadem y q f Manage­ m ent Journal, Junlo de 1991, pp. 370-99. '^A. Van De Ven, A. Delbecq y R. Koenig. Jr., “D eterm inants of Coordination Modes Within Organizations", American Sociological Revfeuy, abrll de 1976, pp. 322-38. Hage y M. Aiken, “Relationship of Centralization to O ther S tru c tu ral Properties". AdmlnlstratUye Science Quarterty, Junlo de 1967. pp. 72-92. PfelTer y G. R. Salancik, The External Control oJOrganizations: A Resource Depend­ ence Perspectiin;, (Nueva York: H arper & Row, 1978), p. 29. *®F. E. Em ery y E. Trist, ‘T h e C asual Texture of O rganizational E nvironm ents”, Human Relations, febrero de 1965. pp. 21-32. 19 p. Lawrence y J . W. Lorsch, Organization an d Ennironment: Managing Differentiation an d Integration. (Boston: Harvard B usiness School, Division of Research, 1967). 20 G. G. Dess y D. W. Beard, “D imensions of Organlz<Ulonal Task E nvironm ents”, /id;níf)ísíraííi)c Science Qiiarfer/y, marzo de 1984, pp. 52-73. ^ 'g . Hofstede, “Motivation, Leadership, and O rganization: Do American Theories Apply Abroad?", Organizational Dynamics, verano de 1980, p. 60. Child, "O rganization S tru ctu re, Environm ent an d Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice", Sociology, enero de 1972, pp. 1-22; y D. S. Pugh. "The M anagem ent of O rganization S tru ctu res: Does Context Determ ine Form?", Organizational Dynamics, prim avera de 1973, pp. 19-34. no J . Pfeffer, Organizational Desigih (Ailington Heights,IL: AHM, 1978). 25 P ara u n a reseñ a de e sta investigación, véase S. P. Robblns, Organization Theory: Structure, Design, an d Applications, 3a. ed., (Englewood ClliTs. NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990), pp. 123-24. ^ ^ é a s e S. Zuboff. In the Age oJ the Smart Machiixe: The Future oJWork and Pouter, (Nueva York: Basic Books, 1988); y J . ChalykoiT y T. A. Kochan, "Computer-Aided Monitoring: Its Influence on Employee Jo b Satisfaction and Turnover", Personnel Psychology, Invierno de 1989, pp. 807-29. ^^Robblns, Organization Theory, p. 107. ^®H. Mintzberg, Sinjcturc U\ Fives; Designing Effective Organizations, (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1983). ^^IbUL, p. 157. H. Mintzberg, The Stnicturing o f Organizations, (Englewood d in 's, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1979), p. 312. ^'M intzberg. Sfniciure in Fines, p. 194. 32 J . Rothschild, “Towards a Fem inine Model of O rganization" ensayo, D epartam ento de Sociología Universidad E statal e Instituto Politécnico de V liglnla, 1991. ^^Mintzberg, Sfnicfwre tn Fines, p. 217. ^‘/bid.. p. 261. 35 D. MUler y P. H. Friesen, Ofpanízaííons; A Quantum View, (Englewood ClliTs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1984), p. 85. ^®S. M. Davis y P. R. Lawrence. “The Matrix D iamond“, W/iarton Magazine, invierno de 1978, pp. 19-27. 37 K. Knlght, "Matrix O rganization: A Review", Jo uw a l o f Management Studies, mayo de 1976, pp. 111-30.