Comportamiento Organizacional

NOTAS 'v é a se , por ejemplo, D. A. Wren, The Euoíuftoa q f Managem ent Thought, 3 a. ed., (Nueva York: Jo h n Wiley & Sons. 1987), sobre todo capítulos 4, 9 , 13-15. 17 y 20. ^A. Sm ith, An Inqutry iiito the Nature and C auses q f the Wealth q f Nations, (Nueva York: Modern Library, 1937; pub. orlg. 1776). ^C. Babbage. Ofi the Economy oJMachinery an d Manufactures, (Londres; C harles Knight, 1832). ‘*R. A, Owen, A New View o f Society, (Nueva York: E. Bliss & White, 1825). ®F. W. Taylor, Principles o f Scientific Management, (Nueva York: Marper & Borthers, 1911). ®/bid. p. 44. ^H. Fayol, Industrial an d General Admliilstratlon, (Paris: Dunod, 1916). ®M. Weber, Tlie Theory o f Social and Economic Organizations, ed. T. P arsons, trad . A. M. H e n d erso n yT . Parsons. (NuevaYork: Free F*ress, 1947). ®Wren, The £i>oíuííofi o f Management Thought, p. 234. '®Véase. por ejemplo, M. P. Follett, The N ew State: Group Organization the Solution o f Popular Goi>emment, (Londres; Longmans. Green & Co. 1918). **C. I B arn ard , r/ie Fimctlons o f the Executive, (Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press. 1938). M iinsterberg, Psychology a n d Industrial Efficiency, (Boston: H oughton MUTlln, 1913). Mayo, The Human Probfenis o f an Induslrlal Cfi'fíízaffoíi, (Nueva York: Macmillan, 1933): y F. J. Roethllsberger y W. J . Dickson, Managem ent an d the Worker, (Cambridge, MA: H arvard University Press, 1939). * ^ é a s e , por ejemplo, A. Carey. “The Haw thorne S tudies: A Radical C riticism “, American Sociological Revtaw, ju n lo de 1967. pp. 403-16; R. H. F ranke y J . Kaul, ‘T h e Haw thorne Experim ents: First S tatistical In terp retation s”, American Sociological Review, o ctub re de 1978, pp. 623-43: B. Rice, “The Haw thorne Defect: Persistence of a Flawed Theory". Psychology Today, febrero de 1982, pp. 70-74; y J . A. Sonnenfeld, "Sheddllng Light on th e Haw thorne S tu d ies“, Joun\al o f Occupational Behavior, abrll de 1985, pp. 111-30. ^^D. Carnegie, Hou’ to Win Friends and Influence People, (Nueva York: Simon & S chuster, 1936). '^ r e n , The £i>o/uiion o f Management Thought, p. 422. *^A. Maslow, Motivation and Personality, (Nueva York: H arper & Row, 1954). *®D. McGregor, The Human Siile o f Enterprise, (Nueva York: McGraw-Hill, 1960). L. Moreno, “C ontributions of Sociometry to R esearch Methodology in Sociology“, American Sociological Review, jun lo de 1947, pp. 287-92. ^V éase, por ejemplo, B.F. Skinner, Science and Human Behavior. (Nueva York: Free P iess, 1953) y B.F. Skinner, Beyond Freedom a n d Dignity (Nueva York: Knopf, 1972). ^ 'd . C. McClelland, The Achieving Society, (Nueva York: Van N ostrand Relnhold, 1961); y D. C. M cC lellandy D. G. W inter, Motivating Economic Achievement, (Nueva York: Free Press, 1969). E. Fiedler, A Theory q/'Leaders/»^ Ef/ectti>eness, (Nueva York: McGraw-Hill, 1967). ^^F. Herzberg, B. M au sn e ry B. Snyderm an, Tiie Moíínafío/i to Work, (Nueva York: Jo h n Wiley. 1959) y F. Herzberg, The Managerial Choice: To Be Efficient o f to Be Human, ed. rev., (Salt Lake City: O lympus, 1982). ^'^J. R. H ackm an y G. R. O ldham , “Development of th e Jo b D iagnostic Survey“, Journal o f Applied Psychology, abril de 1975, pp. 159-70. ^■"Véase. por ejemplo, J. M. Shepard y J . G. Hougland, J r., “Contingency Theory: ’Complex Man' or 'Complex Organization'?", A cadem y o f Management Review , Jullo de 1978, pp. 413-27; y H. L. Tosl. Jr. y J . W. Slocum . Jr.. “Contingency Theory: Some Suggested D irections". Jouniaf o f Management, prim avera de 1984, pp. 9-26. ^®C. A. O'Reilly III, "Organizational Behavior: Where We've Been, Where We’re Going", en M. R. Rosenzweig y L. W. Porter (eds.). A nnual Review o f Psychology, Vol. 42, (Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc., 1991), pp. 429-30.